Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AV255
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-100 versus FujiFilm AV250, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and AV250 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and AV250 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-100 was manufactured 3 years after the AV250 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-100 grades against the AV250 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 and FujiFilm FinePix AV250. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and FujiFilm AV250 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the FujiFilm AV250
| EX-100 | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 38 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Casio EX-100
| AV250 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and FujiFilm AV250
| EX-100 | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 comes with external dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm AV250 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 versus FujiFilm AV250 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-100 vs the AV250.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and AV250 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The picture below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and AV250.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the FujiFilm AV250 will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer EX-100 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-100 vs FujiFilm AV250 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 |
| Also called | - | FinePix AV255 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3440 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | 180 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $572 | $160 |