Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-100 and Olympus 9000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and 9000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-100 was released 4 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-100 grades versus the 9000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus 9000
| EX-100 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 58 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-100
| 9000 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus 9000
| EX-100 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 provides exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-100 and Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-100 and the 9000.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and 9000 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and 9000.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-100 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The younger EX-100 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $300 |
