Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WG-2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was launched 2 years after the WG-2 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-100 grades versus the WG-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Pentax WG-2
EX-100 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 25 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Casio EX-100
WG-2 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Pentax WG-2
EX-100 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 has got outer dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-100 versus the WG-2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and WG-2 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and WG-2.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Pentax WG-2 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-100 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 260 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $572 | $350 |