Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47


93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and CX2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

The EX-100 was launched 4 years after the CX2 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-100 matches up versus the CX2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh CX2
EX-100 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Casio EX-100
CX2 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX2
EX-100 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has got exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-100 vs the CX2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and CX2 is 83 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-100 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer EX-100 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh CX2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $572 | $341 |