Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-100 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was brought out 4 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-100 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | November 2009 | More recent by 52 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-100
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 features external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-100 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 83 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The EX-100 has got the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF more challenging. The younger EX-100 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 gr (0.86 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 320 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $572 | $566 |