Clicky

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
83
Imaging
37
Features
64
Overall
47
Casio Exilim EX-100 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Casio EX-100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
  • 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
  • Launched February 2014
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Announced November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-100 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-100 was brought out 4 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-100 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 EX-100 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014November 2009More recent by 52 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k920kCrisper display (+2k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-100

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro EX-100 

Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 EX-100 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 features external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-100 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 83 and 77 respectively.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

To sum up, both the cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The EX-100 has got the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF more challenging. The younger EX-100 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-100 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
42
focusing manually
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
55
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-100 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography details
70
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor is small (1/1.7")
62
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-100 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Sports photography camera
49
great max shutter speed (1/20,000 seconds)
fast shooting (30.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
good battery life (390 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
32
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery power (320 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-100 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography information
63
good battery life (390 shots)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
49
flash built-in
not so great battery power (320 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-100 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Landscape photography camera
53
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
46
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
not so great battery power (320 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-100 Vlogging features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging features
31
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no external mic socket
20
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-100 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Casio Exilim EX-100Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-100 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2014-02-06 2009-11-10
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Max boosted ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 50mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.8 f/2.5
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 922 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech Super Clear LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 180s
Highest shutter speed 1/20000s 1/3200s
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.10 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 389 gr (0.86 pounds) 453 gr (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 images 320 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $572 $566