Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/1.7").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-100 was unveiled 3 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-100 grades vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | March 2010 | More modern by 48 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-100
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has outer dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-100 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 83 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
All in all, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-100 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-100 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 410 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $572 | $349 |