Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-100 was brought out around the same time to the WG-4 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-100 grades against the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-100 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-100
| WG-4 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-100 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 enjoys external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-100 against the WG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and WG-4 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and WG-4.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will deliver extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $572 | $330 |