Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WG-80 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the WG-80 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-100 matches up vs the WG-80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Ricoh WG-80
| EX-100 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-100
| WG-80 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | February 2014 | Fresher by 100 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-80
| EX-100 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 comes with outer measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-100 and Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-100 against the WG-80.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and WG-80 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and WG-80.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-80 will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-100 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-02-06 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | 300 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $572 | $300 |