Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as ST5500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-100 and Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and CL80 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-100 was revealed 4 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-100 scores vs the CL80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung CL80. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung CL80
| EX-100 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | January 2010 | More recent by 50 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-100
| CL80 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.7" | 3.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung CL80
| EX-100 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 has external dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 and Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-100 vs the CL80.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and CL80 is 83 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and CL80.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung CL80 will show extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung CL80 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $572 | $400 |