Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also Known as PL65
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SL620 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-100 was manufactured 5 years later than the SL620 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-100 grades versus the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-100 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-100
| SL620 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL620
| EX-100 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 has physical dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 and Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-100 against the SL620.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and SL620 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and SL620.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The EX-100 has the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh simpler. The fresher EX-100 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $572 | $200 |