Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WB250F (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-100 was unveiled 14 months after the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-100 scores vs the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-100 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 14 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-100
| WB250F | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-100 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 features physical measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB250F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-100 compared to the WB250F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and WB250F is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The pic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and WB250F.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB250F will give you more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger EX-100 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $572 | $250 |