Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
93 Imaging
52 Features
68 Overall
58
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Announced March 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NX mini (20.5MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NX mini (1") possess different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was launched 3 years before the NX mini which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX mini being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the NX mini in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung NX mini. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung NX mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung NX mini
GR Digital IV | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 461k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX mini over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NX mini | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | September 2011 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung NX mini
GR Digital IV | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung NX mini has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 196 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV against the NX mini.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and NX mini is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and NX mini.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX mini will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 10.5MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung NX mini Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX mini | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung NX mini |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-03-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20.5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX-M |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 2 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 196 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 650 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $599 | $530 |