Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-100 versus Sony S2000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and S2000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-100 was announced 4 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-100 matches up vs the S2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Sony S2000
| EX-100 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Casio EX-100
| S2000 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Sony S2000
| EX-100 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 offers exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 versus Sony S2000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-100 against the S2000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and S2000 is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and S2000.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-100 will produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern EX-100 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-100 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $572 | $225 |