Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
92 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Revealed June 2012
- Replaced the Nikon P300
- New Model is Nikon P330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC100 and Nikon P310, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and P310 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC100 was revealed 4 years earlier than the P310 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-FC100 matches up versus the P310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Nikon Coolpix P310. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Nikon P310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Nikon P310
| EX-FC100 | P310 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Casio EX-FC100
| P310 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Nikon P310
| EX-FC100 | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon P310 has measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC100 and Nikon P310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 against the P310.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and P310 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and P310.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Nikon P310 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FC100 vs Nikon P310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Nikon Coolpix P310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Nikon Coolpix P310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-06-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-100mm (4.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $700 |
