Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000
94 Imaging
31 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FC100 was launched 12 months earlier than the Tough-3000 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-FC100 grades versus the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-FC100 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-FC100
| Tough-3000 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-FC100 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC100 comes with outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC100 against the Tough-3000.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC100 and Tough-3000 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC100 and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus Tough-3000 to render more detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $0 |