Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
94 Imaging
31 Features
21 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-FC100 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FC100 was released 5 years earlier than the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-FC100 grades versus the TG-630 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| EX-FC100 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-FC100
| TG-630 iHS | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| EX-FC100 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 enjoys outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FC100 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 compared to the TG-630 iHS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and TG-630 iHS is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC100 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-630 iHS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $200 |