Clicky

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25

Portability
54
Imaging
62
Features
93
Overall
74
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Launched January 2019
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FS25
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FS25 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M1X was brought out 10 years after the FS25 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1X grades against the FS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FS25

 E-M1X FS25 
AnnouncedJanuary 2019January 2009Newer by 122 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-M1X

 FS25 E-M1X 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FS25

 E-M1X FS25 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X comes with physical measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1X vs the FS25.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and FS25 is 54 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and FS25.

Plainly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1X will produce greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M1X will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1X as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Portrait photography camera
77
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
26
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Street photography highlights
Panasonic FS25 Street photography highlights
67
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports focus via touch
environment proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition (997g)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1X
Sports photography with Panasonic FS25
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (870 per charge)
supports phase detect autofocus
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1X as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FS25 as a Travel photography camera
68
better than average battery (870 shots)
environment proof
supports bluetooth
supports focus via touch
MP count good (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
heavier than competition (997g)
51
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (29mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FS25 Landscape photography advice
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
better than average battery (870 shots)
two card slots
32
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (29mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1X
Vlogging with Panasonic FS25
68
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
heavier than competition (997g)
28
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
wide angle not the best (29mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FS25
 Olympus OM-D E-M1XPanasonic Lumix DMC-FS25
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1X Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2019-01-24 2009-01-27
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 29-145mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.30 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 997 gr (2.20 lbs) 148 gr (0.33 lbs)
Dimensions 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 870 pictures -
Style of battery Built-in -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Dual 1
Pricing at release $2,999 $230