Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25853/2585360c9fb57f9efdaa2748c02226f007cd526b" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front Casio Exilim EX-FC100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FC100 versus Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-FC100 was unveiled 4 years before the VH-410 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-FC100 grades versus the VH-410 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Olympus VH-410. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Olympus VH-410
EX-FC100 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-FC100
VH-410 | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 44 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Olympus VH-410
EX-FC100 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC100 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC100 versus Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2679d/2679deaa04c84e6d07e06af75d85eb82a16a8151" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and VH-410 is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3ddd/e3ddda759c38c68626c0e3984ccd0faf01e0e8fc" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and VH-410.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to produce greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-FC100 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c32d6/c32d607d290a077f90f3f725348b3a030eba060a" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f18d7/f18d73e1b1b8cc5d4f861db455eb73498987e2a3" alt="Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-FC100 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Olympus VH-410 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $300 | $186 |