Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-320, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-620 was launched 3 years prior to the TG-320 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-620 scores vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-320
E-620 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-620
TG-320 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-320
E-620 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 features outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-620 and the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02d90/02d9033e116c03cb7acd1516f56cfffbe85d4639" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and TG-320 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7caa3/7caa328c1e39768eb7fe6513d218fac16ea04f8f" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-320 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddcec/ddcecc8e5a25d7b70f889bdbef72eef719df7a60" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aa1f/9aa1f9b39c2d360df600359db56d98305b81db9b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 150 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $799 | $0 |