Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27


90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013

Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-FC100 was revealed 5 years before the WG-3 GPS which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-FC100 scores against the WG-3 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
EX-FC100 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Casio EX-FC100
WG-3 GPS | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
EX-FC100 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC100 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the WG-3 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and WG-3 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and WG-3 GPS.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to deliver greater detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FC100 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $350 |