Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very comparable but the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FC100 was launched 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-FC100 matches up against the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-FC100 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-FC100
GR Digital IV | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 32 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-FC100 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC100 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FC100 and the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-FC100 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $599 |