Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-FC100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively close but the EX-FC100 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FC100 was launched 14 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-FC100 grades against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-FC100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-FC100
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-FC100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 14 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-FC100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC100 features physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FC100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FC100 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FC100 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will result in more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $300 | $349 |