Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FC100 was unveiled 6 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-FC100 scores against the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-FC100 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-FC100
| WB35F | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-FC100 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 comes with exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FC100 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FC100 versus the WB35F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FC100 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to deliver greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FC100 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $130 |
