Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380
94 Imaging
31 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F3.6-8.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 59 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FC100 and Sony W380, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC100 (9MP) and W380 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FC100 was manufactured 12 months prior to the W380 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FC100 being a Compact camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-FC100 scores against the W380 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC100 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC100 Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC100 over the Sony W380
| EX-FC100 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Casio EX-FC100
| W380 | EX-FC100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC100 and Sony W380
| EX-FC100 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC100 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony W380 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC100 and Sony W380 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FC100 against the W380.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC100 and W380 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC100 and W380.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony W380 to give greater detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC100 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-8.5 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps),448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $44 |