Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
![Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150/Casio-EX-FC150-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix L26 front Nikon Coolpix L26 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-L26/Nikon-L26-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
39 Features
24 Overall
33
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 60 x 29mm
- Released February 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-FC150 and Nikon L26, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and L26 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FC150 was unveiled 3 years before the L26 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-FC150 matches up versus the L26 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Nikon Coolpix L26. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Nikon L26 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Nikon L26
EX-FC150 | L26 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon L26 over the Casio EX-FC150
L26 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 26 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Nikon L26
EX-FC150 | L26 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FC150 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Nikon L26 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FC150 and Nikon L26 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FC150 and the L26.
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L26-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and L26 is 93 and 93 respectively.
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L26-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and L26.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon L26 to resolve greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L26-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L26-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon L26 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix L26 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix L26 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2012-02-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.2-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173g (0.38 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 images |
Type of battery | - | AA |
Battery model | NP-40 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $350 | $70 |