Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f272/1f272bd1a138ca84276ad9995fc74f68f03e2aa7" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67a34/67a3460404a05b3aab5bd9203e69096eb33afe63" alt="Nikon Coolpix P7700 front Nikon Coolpix P7700 front"
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P7100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the P7700 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and P7700 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-FC150 was brought out 4 years prior to the P7700 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the P7700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Nikon Coolpix P7700. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Nikon P7700
EX-FC150 | P7700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Casio EX-FC150
P7700 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Nikon P7700
EX-FC150 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 offers external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Nikon P7700 has proportions of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") having a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 and the P7700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/648d2/648d238e156b2f1d05702fc9047ceb3e8657b394" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and P7700 is 93 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d6cb/6d6cb2d3687b82b4879e3e0736677a89baf35f93" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and P7700.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-FC150 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Nikon P7700 will provide greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bfa9/1bfa92411a8c04275939918a1076c9a048a24f67" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43c5f/43c5f79f6cc341ae59211b9012e8280c09b731be" alt="Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2013-05-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173 gr (0.38 pounds) | 392 gr (0.86 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 191 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $350 | $499 |