Clicky

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
20
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
  • 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
  • Announced November 2009
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-FC150 was revealed 11 years prior to the E-M1 III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the E-M1 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 EX-FC150 E-M1 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Casio EX-FC150

 E-M1 III EX-FC150 
IntroducedFebruary 2020November 2009More modern by 124 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus E-M1 III

 EX-FC150 E-M1 III 
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 has outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the E-M1 III.

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and E-M1 III is 93 and 67 respectively.

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and E-M1 III.

Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FC150 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in more detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography details
25
you can focus manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
76
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FC150
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features touch to focus
weather proof
very good ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Sports photography details
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography details
30
high frames per second (40.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
80
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 Travel photography info
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography info
50
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
79
weather proof
supports bluetooth
features touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FC150 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
31
you can focus manually
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse function
81
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proof
has double storage slots
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-FC150
Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
79
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external microphone port
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus E-M1 III
 Casio Exilim EX-FC150Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-FC150 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Type Small Sensor Compact Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2009-11-16 2020-02-11
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic IX
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 64 200
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 121
Cross focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 37-185mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.6-4.5 -
Macro focus range 5cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/1000s 1/8000s
Max silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shutter speed 40.0 frames per sec 60.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 2.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 4096x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 173 gr (0.38 lbs) 580 gr (1.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 420 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-40 BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Storage slots Single Two
Launch price $350 $1,800