Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III
93 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FC150 was revealed 11 years prior to the E-M1 III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the E-M1 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| EX-FC150 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Casio EX-FC150
| E-M1 III | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 | November 2009 | More modern by 124 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus E-M1 III
| EX-FC150 | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 has outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the E-M1 III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and E-M1 III is 93 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and E-M1 III.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FC150 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in more detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-11-16 | 2020-02-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 121 |
| Cross focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/8000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lbs) | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Storage slots | Single | Two |
| Launch price | $350 | $1,800 |