Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FC150 was brought out very close to the Tough-3000 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-FC150 matches up against the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-FC150 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-FC150
| Tough-3000 | EX-FC150 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-FC150 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-FC150 against the Tough-3000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The image here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus Tough-3000 to give extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-11-16 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $0 |