Clicky

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Casio EX-FC150
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
  • 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
  • Launched November 2009
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Announced February 2012
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-FC150 was revealed 3 years before the TG-820 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-FC150 grades against the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

          

          

            
 EX-FC150 TG-820 iHS 
Manually focus  Very exact focus
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-FC150

          

          

            
 TG-820 iHS EX-FC150 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012November 2009Newer by 27 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1030k230kCrisper display (+800k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

          

          

            
 EX-FC150 TG-820 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch display  Absent Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FC150 provides exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and TG-820 iHS is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The pic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-820 iHS to deliver more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

            Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
26
 manual focus
 lack of manual exposure
 external flash not possible
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
26
 comes with face detect focus
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Street Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Street photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography information
55
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-FC150 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
30
 high max fps (40.0 frames/s)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect AF
34
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with tracking focus
 environment proof
 slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 terrible battery life (220 per charge)
 has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Travel photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography features
50
 has built in flash
 lack of Timelapse mode
 low MP (10MP)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not great (37mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
58
 environment proof
 flash built-in
 fairly wide (28mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 does not contain selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography highlights
31
 manual focus
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not great (37mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
 small screen (2.7 inch)
 lack of manual exposure
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
 lack of Timelapse mode
38
 fairly wide (28mm)
 screen is a good size (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
 manual exposure not available
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 terrible battery life (220 shots)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 wide angle not great (37mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
 lack of external microphone port
33
 fairly wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detect focus
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
 does not contain selfie friendly display
 lack of mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Casio Exilim EX-FC150Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Brand Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FC150 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-11-16 2012-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VI
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-185mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.6-4.5 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,030k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Display technology - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 40.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 2.60 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 173g (0.38 lb) 206g (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-40 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $350 $500