Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FC150 was revealed 3 years before the TG-1 iHS which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-FC150 grades versus the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX-FC150 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Casio EX-FC150
| TG-1 iHS | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX-FC150 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and TG-1 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The picture below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-1 iHS to give extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173g (0.38 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $399 |
