Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
![Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front Casio Exilim EX-FC150 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150/Casio-EX-FC150-front.jpg)
![Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VH-410/Olympus-VH-410-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FC150 was introduced 3 years before the VH-410 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the VH-410 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus VH-410
EX-FC150 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-FC150
VH-410 | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VH-410
EX-FC150 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus VH-410 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the VH-410.
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Olympus-VH-410-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and VH-410 is 93 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Olympus-VH-410-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The visual below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and VH-410.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VH-410 to produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind in sensor tech.
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Olympus-VH-410-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FC150-vs-Olympus-VH-410-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VH-410 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $350 | $186 |