Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FC150 was introduced 3 years before the VH-410 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the VH-410 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus VH-410
| EX-FC150 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-FC150
| VH-410 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VH-410
| EX-FC150 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 versus Olympus VH-410 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 versus the VH-410.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and VH-410 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The visual below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FC150 and VH-410.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VH-410 to produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $350 | $186 |