Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FC150 was brought out very close to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-FC150 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-FC150
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-FC150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-FC150 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | November 2009 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FC150 offers physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 93 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FC150 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will give you extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-11-16 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 173 gr (0.38 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $350 | $566 |