Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FC150 was launched 8 years prior to the WG-50 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-FC150 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-FC150
| WG-50 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 91 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-FC150 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 features outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC150 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 compared to the WG-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FC150 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and WG-50.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FC150 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $350 | $280 |