Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released November 2002
- Newer Model is Sigma SD10
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-FC150 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC150 was brought out 7 years after the SD9 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-FC150 grades vs the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Sigma SD9
| EX-FC150 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2009 |  | November 2002 | Newer by 85 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-FC150
| SD9 | EX-FC150 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Sigma SD9
| EX-FC150 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FC150 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FC150 vs the SD9.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FC150 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FC150 and SD9.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FC150 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Casio EX-FC150 will result in greater detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-FC150 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FC150 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Sigma SD9 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-11-16 | 2002-11-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 gr (0.38 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $3,001 |