Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH100 was revealed 13 months prior to the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-FH100 scores versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-FH100 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-FH100
| VR-320 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-FH100 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 provides outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FH100 and the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The graphic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and VR-320.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $179 |