Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-330, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FH100 was introduced 7 months prior to the VR-330 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-FH100 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-FH100
| VR-330 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-FH100 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH100 features external dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 and the VR-330.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and VR-330 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and VR-330.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $220 |