Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

The EX-FH100 was brought out 9 years earlier than the GR III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-FH100 grades versus the GR III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GR III
EX-FH100 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Casio EX-FH100
GR III | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 100 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GR III
EX-FH100 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the GR III.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and GR III is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and GR III.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH100 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh GR III will deliver greater detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GR III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $299 | $900 |