Clicky

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
36
Overall
34
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Casio EX-FH100
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
  • Launched June 2010
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The EX-FH100 was brought out 9 years earlier than the GR III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-FH100 grades versus the GR III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GR III

 EX-FH100 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Casio EX-FH100

 GR III EX-FH100 
LaunchedSeptember 2018June 2010Fresher by 100 months
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GR III

 EX-FH100 GR III 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the GR III.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and GR III is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and GR III.

As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH100 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh GR III will deliver greater detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography factors
35
focusing manually
supports RAW files
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
80
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FH100
Street photography with Ricoh GR III
64
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
provides touch to focus
lighter than others (257g)
above average ISO range (102,400)
no moving screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-FH100
Sports photography with Ricoh GR III
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow fps (4.0 fps)
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Travel photography details
Ricoh GR III Travel photography details
56
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse function
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than others (257g)
provides touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography information
47
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse function
69
manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (102,400)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR III Vlogging highlights
28
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
37
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (257 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GR III
 Casio Exilim EX-FH100Ricoh GR III
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Ricoh GR III
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-06-16 2018-09-25
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 3200 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8-16
Macro focus range 7cm 6cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 201 grams (0.44 lbs) 257 grams (0.57 lbs)
Dimensions 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $299 $900