Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/314d0/314d081e7026057adb16897eb920f5e2e6b77cee" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FH100 front Casio Exilim EX-FH100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19064/19064172b06e5d452c23117f62fb823105c4f36b" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front"
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-FH100 was released 3 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-FH100 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-FH100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-FH100
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-FH100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2010 | ![]() | March 2010 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 has outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-FH100 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6855a/6855a1483e8674297e1f3ed6ff466f18e5822864" alt="Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd46c/fd46c17e20c13e6bdf050575b1d44c6a672ec386" alt="Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The EX-FH100 provides the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eef8/5eef8fae307f6b3fadf3b000a5f7fd822a5d6e4c" alt="Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed943/ed943806e9f57060e4a01897f6741e9238ec3d57" alt="Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $299 | $349 |