Clicky

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
36
Overall
34
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-FH100
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Introduced March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The EX-FH100 was released 3 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-FH100 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-FH100 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-FH100

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-FH100 
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-FH100 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedJune 2010March 2010Same age
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 has outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-FH100 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The EX-FH100 provides the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
35
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
36
has manual focus
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Street photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography information
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (355g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
56
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
60
lighter than competition in class (355g)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
47
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
47
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
28
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-FH100Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2010-06-16 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 201 grams (0.44 pounds) 355 grams (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $299 $349