Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SP-810 UZ was released 5 months prior to the TG-320 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SP-810 UZ grades against the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus TG-320
| SP-810 UZ | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
| TG-320 | SP-810 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus TG-320
| SP-810 UZ | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2012 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-810 UZ has got physical measurements of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SP-810 UZ against the TG-320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SP-810 UZ and TG-320 is 78 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-810 UZ and TG-320.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of files though you will need to factor the release date of the cameras into account.
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus SP-810 UZ | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-810 UZ | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-864mm (36.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 0.7fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.20 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $280 | $0 |