Clicky

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
36
Overall
34
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-FH100
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
  • Launched June 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-FH100 was launched 4 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-FH100 matches up against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-FH100 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-FH100

 DP2 Quattro EX-FH100 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014June 2010Newer by 44 months
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-FH100 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-FH100 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FH100 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-FH100
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
35
manual focus
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
77
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
64
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography factors
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
48
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
56
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
53
good MP (20MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography factors
47
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
9
no video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH100 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-FH100Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-06-16 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 201 gr (0.44 pounds) 395 gr (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $299 $931