Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
52 Imaging
41 Features
63 Overall
49
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Launched March 2015
- Successor is Nikon P1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and P900 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH25 was announced 5 years before the P900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-FH25 grades against the P900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Nikon Coolpix P900. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Nikon P900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon P900
| EX-FH25 | P900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Casio EX-FH25
| P900 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon P900
| EX-FH25 | P900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with outside measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Nikon P900 has sizing of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") and a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 and the P900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and P900 is 69 and 52 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and P900.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon P900 to result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon P900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix P900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix P900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2015-03-02 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 921k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 899g (1.98 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL23 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $600 |