Clicky

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
69
Imaging
34
Features
37
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
  • Released July 2010
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-FH25 was announced 7 years before the E-M1 II and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 EX-FH25 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Casio EX-FH25

 E-M1 II EX-FH25 
IntroducedSeptember 2016July 2010Fresher by 75 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus E-M1 II

 EX-FH25 E-M1 II 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 features outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 and the E-M1 II.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and E-M1 II is 69 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and E-M1 II.

As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography information
36
manual focus
delivers RAW files
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
76
manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
supports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FH25
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
51
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (524g)
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than competition (574g)
good ISO range (25,600)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
42
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
supports phase detect auto focus
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-FH25
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
49
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
long zoom (520mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (524g)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
72
lighter than competition (574g)
environment proof
features touch to focus
decent MP (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
45
manual focus
pretty wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse function
76
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
has dual storage slots
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
22
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (524g)
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with microphone jack
lighter than competition (574g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Casio Exilim EX-FH25Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-FH25 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Pro Mirrorless
Released 2010-07-06 2016-09-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VIII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-4.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Available lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/8000 secs
Max silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 40.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.30 m 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 4096x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MOV, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 524 grams (1.16 lbs) 574 grams (1.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.8
DXO Low light score not tested 1312
Other
Battery life - 350 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots One 2
Launch pricing $450 $1,700