Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was announced 7 years before the E-M1 II and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus E-M1 II
EX-FH25 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Casio EX-FH25
E-M1 II | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | July 2010 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus E-M1 II
EX-FH25 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 features outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 and the E-M1 II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and E-M1 II is 69 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and E-M1 II.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Launch pricing | $450 | $1,700 |