Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Casio EX-FH25 and Pentax WG-3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WG-3 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH25 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WG-3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the WG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Pentax WG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-FH25 | WG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-FH25
| WG-3 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Pentax WG-3
| EX-FH25 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has outside measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 and Pentax WG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the WG-3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and WG-3 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and WG-3.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 to render greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Pentax |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $300 |