Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively close but the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was released 12 months later than the GR Digital III and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-FH25 grades against the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-FH25 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-FH25
GR Digital III | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-FH25 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers outer measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH25 and the GR Digital III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and GR Digital III is 69 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 has got the smaller sensor which will make getting bokeh harder. The younger EX-FH25 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $450 | $399 |