Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 19 months before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-FH25 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-FH25
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | July 2010 | More recent by 19 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-FH25 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 69 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The visual below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
All in all, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-FH25 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will result in extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 550 gr (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $450 | $871 |