Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and ST600 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH25 was launched 7 months later than the ST600 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the ST600 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung ST600. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung ST600
| EX-FH25 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Casio EX-FH25
| ST600 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST600
| EX-FH25 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST600 has sizing of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the ST600.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and ST600 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and ST600.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung ST600 to give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher EX-FH25 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST600 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB07 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $450 | $330 |