Sony T900 vs Sony WX50
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Sony T900 vs Sony WX50, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and WX50 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe T900 was brought out 3 years prior to the WX50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony WX50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the T900 scores vs the WX50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The entire galleries are viewable at Sony T900 Gallery & Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony WX50
T900 | WX50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 461k | Crisper display (+461k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Sony T900
WX50 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 35 months |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony WX50
T900 | WX50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Sony T900 comes with physical measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Sony WX50 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the T900 versus the WX50.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the T900 and WX50 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the T900 and WX50.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony WX50 to provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged T900 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony T900 vs Sony WX50 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 2s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) | 117 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $250 |