Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH25 was manufactured 6 months earlier than the ST65 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the ST65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-FH25 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-FH25
| ST65 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST65
| EX-FH25 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | January 2011 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST65 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the ST65.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and ST65 is 69 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and ST65.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung ST65 to show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $130 |