Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 3 years before the WB250F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-FH25 grades vs the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-FH25 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB250F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-FH25 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the WB250F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and WB250F is 69 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and WB250F.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB250F to result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $450 | $250 |