Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WB50F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the WB50F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-FH25 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB50F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-FH25 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the WB50F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and WB50F is 69 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and WB50F.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB50F to give you more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $180 |